Testing of a New Nursing Process Software in Selected Low Resource Nigerian Hospitals: A Multicentre Pre-Post Study

Authors

  • Chinemerem Eleke Author
  • Ada Nwaneri Author
  • Ijeoma Okoronkwo Author
  • Anthonia Chinweuba Author
  • Ifeyinwa Agu Author
  • Joy Samuel Author
  • Tex-jack Dokuba Author
  • Sabinah Ngbala-Okpabi Author
  • Magnus Chinedu Apuanu Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v28i4S.8592

Keywords:

Documentation, Nursing, Software, Timeliness, Usability

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of electronic nursing process solutions tailored for low resource hospitals in Nigeria where paper-aided documentation is cumbersome and internet services are limited. The locally developed nursing process software (named ENPF) with incorporated 235 nursing diagnosis taxonomy codes was recently published, and this study tested the ENPF in seven public hospitals in Nigeria.

Methods: A multicentre pre-post intervention design was applied. A random sample of 872 clinical nurses was examined by three purposively selected nursing professors. The participants documented their daily nursing activities with pen and paper at baseline for seven days and used the ENPF for another seven days. A random selection of 872 paper and ENPF-aided nursing process records made by the nurses were paired and assessed for completeness, accuracy, timeliness, and perceived usability. The tool for data collection was an assembled questionnaire including free versions of standardized tools (Documentation Audit Checklist, Quality of Nursing Diagnosis-Intervention-and-Outcomes Scale, and Perceived Usability Scale). Data analysis was done with descriptive and inferential statistics at p < 0.05. The study was independently approved by three relevant Institutional Review Boards in Nigeria.

Results: The ENPF-aided documentation was significantly better than paper in terms of completeness (75.2% vs. 49.2%, p = < 0.001), timeliness (39.75 vs. 78.87 seconds, p = <0.001), and accuracy (nursing diagnoses: mean 2.96 vs. 1.02, p = <0.001; interventions: 2.52 vs. 1.42, p = <0.001; outcome: 2.63 vs. 1.11, p = 0.006; Criterion mean 3.00).  The ENPF was perceived to have better usability (3.25 vs. 2.98, p = < 0.001) than paper-based documentation.

Conclusions: Electronic solutions tailored for low resource nursing settings for ease in usability can improve the completeness, accuracy, and timeliness of nursing documentation. Hospital administrators should consider deploying electronic solutions to improve nursing documentation quality.

Author Biographies

  • Chinemerem Eleke

    Department of Nursing, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

     Department of Nursing Science, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria

    Department of Child Health, Africa Centre of Excellence for Public Health and Toxicological Research, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

  • Ada Nwaneri

    Department of Nursing Science, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria

  • Ijeoma Okoronkwo

    Department of Nursing Science, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria

  • Anthonia Chinweuba

    Department of Nursing Science, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria

  • Ifeyinwa Agu

    Department of Nursing Science, Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria

  • Joy Samuel

    Department of Child Health, Africa Centre of Excellence for Public Health and Toxicological Research, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

  • Tex-jack Dokuba

     Department of Midwifery, Africa Centre of Excellence for Public Health and Toxicological Research, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

  • Sabinah Ngbala-Okpabi

    Department of Nursing, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

  • Magnus Chinedu Apuanu

    Department of Nursing, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria

Downloads

Published

2022-11-06

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Testing of a New Nursing Process Software in Selected Low Resource Nigerian Hospitals: A Multicentre Pre-Post Study. (2022). African Journal of Biomedical Research, 28(4S), 424-432. https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v28i4S.8592

Most read articles by the same author(s)