A Comparative Analysis of Cosmetovigilance Frameworks in Key Regions: Europe, the United States, Japan, and India

Authors

  • Sabarish Sachithandandan J Author
  • Adusumilli Pramod Kumar Author
  • Jeesa George Author
  • Ranjan G Author
  • Yuvaraaj SN Author
  • Naveen N Prabu Author
  • Rohith S Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.5873

Keywords:

Cosmetovigilance, Cosmetics, Regulations, Post-marketing.

Abstract

Cosmetovigilance is defined as the surveillance or monitoring of cosmetics-related adverse events or effects. Monitoring and assessing the safety of cosmetic products after they are on the market is crucial. Manufacturers conduct this post-market surveillance to ensure the safe use of their products by consumers.

Due to the increasing demand for the use of cosmetics at the global level, the adherence to regulatory guidelines by the manufacturers from an international perspective is a must to provide the safe and effective use of cosmetics among cosmetic users and also to protect the environment. As the cosmetics industry expands, so does the need for robust regulatory frameworks that govern cosmetovigilance activities. This article reviews the cosmetovigilance frameworks across key regions-Europe, the United States, Japan, and the emerging market in India. It highlights the differences in regulations, enforcement, reporting mechanisms, recent updates and future trends toward improvisation in cosmetovigilance in India. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview for regulators, manufacturers, and stakeholders interested in the safety and efficacy of cosmetics in India.

Author Biographies

  • Sabarish Sachithandandan J

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, The Nilgiris, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • Adusumilli Pramod Kumar

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

  • Jeesa George

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

  • Ranjan G

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, The Nilgiris, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • Yuvaraaj SN

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, The Nilgiris, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • Naveen N Prabu

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, The Nilgiris, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.

  • Rohith S

    Department of Pharmacy Practice, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, The Nilgiris, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

A Comparative Analysis of Cosmetovigilance Frameworks in Key Regions: Europe, the United States, Japan, and India. (2024). African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27(4S), 11977-11982. https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.5873

Most read articles by the same author(s)