Intrathecal Morphine vs. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Study

Authors

  • Dr. S.B. Gangadhar Author
  • Dr. Pooja NV Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.4100

Keywords:

Intrathecal morphine, Transversus abdominis plane block, Cesarean section, Postoperative analgesia, Pain management

Abstract

Objective:This study aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in cesarean section patients.

 

Background:Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for recovery and patient satisfaction following cesarean sections. This study evaluates the comparative analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine and TAP block.

 

Methods: A prospective, randomized study included 128 patients aged 18-60 years, ASA I & II, undergoing elective cesarean sections. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either intrathecal morphine or TAP block. Postoperative pain scores, hemodynamic parameters, and rescue analgesia requirements were recorded.

 

Results: Patients receiving intrathecal morphine experienced significantly lower pain scores and extended time before requiring first analgesia compared to those receiving TAP block. Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups.

 

Conclusion:Intrathecal morphine demonstrates superior analgesic efficacy compared to TAP block in cesarean sections, suggesting it may be the preferred method for managing postoperative pain in these patients.

Author Biographies

  • Dr. S.B. Gangadhar

    Professor and HOD, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur

  • Dr. Pooja NV

    Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur

Published

2024-11-25

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Intrathecal Morphine vs. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Study. (2024). African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27(4S), 2725-2730. https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.4100