Effectiveness of Remote vs. Face-to-Face Physiotherapy in Musculoskeletal Care: The REFORM Study
PDF

Keywords

Remote Physiotherapy
Face-to-Face Physiotherapy
Musculoskeletal Disorders
Pain Reduction
Functional Improvement
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trial

How to Cite

Effectiveness of Remote vs. Face-to-Face Physiotherapy in Musculoskeletal Care: The REFORM Study. (2024). African Journal of Biomedical Research, 27(3), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.53555/sh57r557

Abstract

This paper aims at comparing the outcomes of patients who received remote physiotherapy to those who received face-to-face physiotherapy for individuals diagnosed with MSDs via a sample of 120 patients through a randomized control trial. Both internship modalities incorporated individual sessions once per week over a course of 8 weeks and with outcomes considered on the basis of pain self-reported using the Numerical Rating Scale accompanied with the patient’s improvement indices based on the Oswestry Disability Index or WOMAC, quality of life by SF-36, and patient satisfaction.

It was ascertained that remote physiotherapy is as effective in terms of decreasing pain and increasing functional ability and quality of life as face-to-face therapy. Although the results show that face-to-face group was somewhat more satisfied, the results are indicative of successful application of remote physiotherapy as a viable solution for those who are unable to attend the standard physiotherapy service. Thus, further research is needed to identify long-term consequences and the role of technology in the effectiveness of therapy.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 African Journal of Biomedical Research